A crisis can hit an organization in a matter of minutes and cause significant damage if not addressed effectively. The true test of resilience lies in how well you can manage its impact, minimize damage, and recover. To do so organizations must be equipped with a clear action plan and be able to respond swiftly.
In this article, we will explore some of the key components of a robust incident response framework that will help you immediately action effective mitigation strategies.
A crisis communication plan is a strategic blueprint of all the tools and processes that a company must use to address emergencies. A robust roadmap can help you to respond quickly to an evolving situation and disseminate verified information to internal and external stakeholders.
Effective emergency coordination is also increasingly becoming a regulatory expectation. The European Union’s NIS2 Directive deals specifically with cybersecurity and mandates robust response and management protocols as part of the enterprise’s risk management blueprint. It requires organizations to maintain detailed records of incident response collaboration and assess their impact. Crisis communication is no longer a nice-to-have back-up approach; it is a vital piece of corporate strategy that determines its resilience and drives regulatory compliance.
Read more about how to achieve NIS2 Compliance.
The first 72 hours after a cyber incident are critical. Your framework must be comprehensive and outline the tools and protocols teams will use to address the situation.
Who within the organization will spearhead the response effort? Who will take charge of which tasks? Who will be the face of the company to external and internal audiences? These are critical questions to address early in the preparation stage.
Establish a clearly defined communication tree that specifies roles, channels, and how information should flow during a negative event. This includes:
Escalation paths ensure that appropriate resources and expertise are mobilized to address the crisis effectively:
Emergency management, coordination and information sharing should never take place on unsecured channels and tools. As the SignalGate scandal demonstrated, consumer grade messaging apps pose serious security risks. Even many enterprise messaging platforms lack strong security features. A hack, a leak, or an unauthorized participant added to the group chat can exacerbate a bad situation. Encrypted, safe communication channels are also a regulatory requirement under the NIS2 Directive.
Protected messaging and coordination during an emergency require:
Quick responses and updates are invaluable for reassuring stakeholders, ensuring there is no miscommunication or speculation, and maintaining trust. It is a good idea to templatize certain routine messages and holding statements to be used quickly during a crisis:
You’ve done the work and created a robust crisis coordination strategy. But can you be sure it will work in practice and that all team members are well versed in their roles and duties?
Inadequate Planning and Testing - Your response framework must be clear and unambiguous. Every team member needs to know their responsibilities. They should know the protocols and be able to easily access copies of the roadmap. Train them to use the tools available for coordinated response. Any gaps in planning will lead to delays, confusion, and miscommunication which only make the situation worse. Test all messaging channels regularly to ensure they are reliable and secure. Periodic simulations are critical to ensure smooth implementation.
Inappropriate Collaboration Channels - The Trump administration faced a serious security lapse in March 2024. Senior cabinet members inadvertently added a journalist to a Signal chat group where they discussed military operations. The journalist remained undetected, and was privy to sensitive information shared. Using consumer messaging apps like WhatsApp or Signal may be convenient but they have significant security gaps that can be exploited by malicious actors. Even many enterprise platforms have inadequate data protection measures in place. It is crucial to deploy fully encrypted channels that also enforce role-based access controls.
Difficult to use platforms – Effective emergency management demands quick response and seamless coordination. A highly secure but difficult to use channel will slow teams down. And they may turn to unauthorized consumer applications to collaborate. This creates the risk of further breaches which will only make the situation worse. Enterprise communication channels must be intuitive by design and allow users to quickly leverage them in an emergency.
Insufficient debrief and analysis – Crisis management efforts don’t end when the incident is resolved. It is crucial to conduct a detailed debrief of the situation and analyze the response effort. You must identify what worked well and what could be improved, and update the blueprint accordingly. Ensure that your messaging platform stores detailed logs and records for audit and regulatory submission.
Do you have a crisis communication plan in place already? Does it cover all the essential elements we have listed here? Map it against these questions to see how effective it is, and identify areas of improvement:
Know more about creating a robust crisis communication strategy.
Download Wire's whitepaper here.