How to Choose the Right European Alternative to Slack & Teams

Across Europe, organizations are rethinking the tools they use to collaborate. With stricter regulations like GDPR, NIS2 and DORA, and growing awareness of digital sovereignty, many IT and compliance leaders are asking a simple question: Is it time to move away from U.S.-based communication platforms such as Slack and MS Teams? 

The answer increasingly points toward European-built alternatives, platforms designed within EU jurisdiction, aligned with local compliance frameworks. This shift is needed to regain control over data residency and communication at a time when privacy, sovereignty and trust are under pressure.

Threat actors are also becoming more sophisticated, exploiting new technologies like AI and deep-learning automation to target enterprise systems. According to the World Economic Forum 72% of global leaders said that they had registered a marked increase in enterprise cyber risks. Combined with today’s geopolitical tensions and the growing interdependence of digital systems, this makes secure communication a strategic necessity.

Why It’s Time to Reassess Slack and Teams 

Popular tools like Slack and Microsoft Teams dominate enterprise communication, but their inadequate end-to-end encryption and metadata protection are becoming impossible to ignore. They also have backdoor access points that threat actors can exploit. Both platforms are US-based and are subject to extraterritorial laws like the CLOUD Act that allow US authorities to access data stored by American companies regardless of where the data is located. This is in direct conflict with the GDPR. These issues pose a serious concern for European organizations, particularly those in sensitive and highly regulated sectors. As the region pushes ahead with its digital sovereignty agenda, it is time for enterprises to consider European alternatives for their communication needs.

Take Back Control of Your Digital Infrastructure

Explore how leading European enterprises are reducing reliance on Big Tech.
Our Enterprise Guide breaks down real strategies to regain sovereignty, compliance, and trust.

Download the Report

What to Look for in a Secure European Collaboration Tool 

A truly sovereign collaboration platform must be user-friendly, and easy to integrate, but a tool built for European organizations must also ensure maximum data security and privacy while aligning with the emerging digital sovereignty agenda. Here are some key features you must consider when selecting a European messaging and collaboration solution: 

End-to-end encryption (E2EE): Full encryption must apply to all communication - messages, calls, and files - both at rest and in transit. Slack, MS Teams and many other enterprise-grade applications do not fully encrypt messages, calls, and files. Metadata is often left unencrypted. To comply with European data privacy and security regulations like the GDPR and NIS2, the communication platform must ensure end-to-end encryption for all activity on the platform and extend protection to metadata as well. Messages must be encrypted at rest as well as in transit and must be accessible only for the intended recipients. 

Data Residency & Jurisdiction: The GDPR places strict restrictions on data transfers outside the EU and the region is increasingly pushing for data residency requirements for software providers. A European communication platform must have hosting servers within the EU /EEA to comply with local regulations and reduce exposure to foreign surveillance laws.

Compliance and Sovereignty: The EU is home to some of the world’s most stringent data privacy and security regulations like GDPR, the NIS2 Directive and DORA. Communication tools must comply with all relevant laws and have the processes in place to meet all requirements for incident reporting and data transfers. The tool must also be agile enough to quickly adapt to emerging standards and frameworks particularly focused on digital sovereignty. 

Transparency & Open Source: One of the objectives of digital sovereignty is to ensure transparency and avoid vendor lock-in. The communication platform must be open-source with publicly available code, auditable architecture and no hidden backdoors. 

How European Alternatives Compare: A Feature Overview

Here is a snapshot of key European communication platform providers and how they stack up against the region’s sovereignty and compliance requirements: 

Migration Tips: Moving from Slack/Teams to a Sovereign Stack

For decades, US-based solution providers ruled over the European market. They offer companies a powerful mix of ease of use, scalability, and flexibility that’s deeply integrated into their IT infrastructure. Shifting to European alternatives will be a challenge that enterprises must plan carefully for. The transition is not just about technology, but also about managing change and guiding user adoption.  

Here are some ways in which organizations can handle this change: 

1. Start by defining the use-cases and identifying and explaining the WHY –why your organization needs to pivot away from established US-based communication platforms to European alternatives. This will help secure management buy in.
2. Derive test cases based on “user stories”. For example, create a test case based on the user story of needing to store files and share them with external users.
3. User stories should also consider IT, IT security and data privacy priorities.
4. Assemble the pilot group that test the user stories. This will help familiarize teams with the process and gather feedback. It will also allow you to quickly spot change management issues and give you time to work out plans to address them.
5. Ideally, the pilot phase should include at least two solutions so that you can compare the two.
6. Once the pilot is successfully concluded and you have decided on a platform, create a change / implementation plan for rollout
7. Your change management strategy must include provisions for user adoption, training, and workflow adaptation, and follow a phased approach

Conclusion

Digital sovereignty is no longer just a trend. Choosing a European alternative to Slack or Teams is more than a security upgrade; it’s a strategic commitment to data protection, compliance, and trust. European organizations need to reclaim control over their data and protect sensitive information from extra territorial access to ensure complete compliance with EU laws and foster public trust.