European enterprises have built much of their digital infrastructure on U.S. platforms such as Microsoft 365 or AWS. These tools power everyday collaboration and productivity, but they also expose organizations to legal, operational, and reputational risks that are often underestimated.

As Europe tightens its regulatory frameworks around digital sovereignty, GDPR, NIS2, and DORA, this dependency on foreign infrastructure is no longer just a compliance issue. It’s a strategic risk that affects resilience, autonomy, and trust.

Download The Enterprise Guide to EU Alternatives

Europe’s Heavy Reliance on U.S. Platforms Creates Legal and Strategic Blind Spots

Governments across Europe are starting to admit the scale of their exposure.
In August 2025, the German government publicly acknowledged that Germany remains dependent on U.S. companies for critical technologies such as cloud infrastructure, operating systems, and networking. Even sensitive agencies, including the Federal Police, continue to use AWS and Microsoft services, despite the extraterritorial reach of U.S. surveillance laws.

This reliance is mirrored across Europe’s private sector. Amazon, Microsoft, and Google together control nearly 70% of the European cloud market, giving them unmatched influence over how and where enterprise data is stored and processed. Under U.S. law, these firms remain obligated to comply with data access requests, even if that data sits inside European borders.

The result: European organizations are operating in a legal grey zone where compliance with EU regulation and exposure to U.S. jurisdiction collide.

The Main Risks Behind Europe’s Dependence on U.S. Cloud Providers

1. Legal and Compliance Exposure
   U.S. legislation such as the CLOUD Act and FISA Section 702 allows American authorities to compel access to data from U.S.-based companies, regardless of where that data is stored. This puts European enterprises at odds with GDPR, NIS2, and DORA, which require strict protection of personal and operational data. The conflict is about jurisdiction and control.
2. Operational Continuity and Service Disruptions
   Dependence on U.S. vendors also creates single points of failure. These companies can be forced to halt services or restrict access for political or legal reasons. Microsoft’s suspension of email access for international organizations and the October 2025 AWS outage, which disrupted public services across Europe, show how external decisions can impact domestic operations.
   
3. Reputational and Strategic Risk
   One breach or exposure involving a U.S. platform can erase years of trust. Regulators, clients, and the public increasingly expect critical data to be governed within European law. As trust becomes a competitive differentiator, continued reliance on non-EU infrastructure risks signaling a lack of accountability.
4. Vendor Lock-in and Loss of Negotiating Power
   Long contracts, proprietary software, and ecosystem dependency make it expensive for organizations to switch providers. This lock-in effect weakens negotiating leverage and limits innovation. True sovereignty means not only legal compliance but also the freedom to choose and move.
   

U.S. and EU Laws Fundamentally Conflict

The EU–U.S. Data Privacy Framework (DPF) was designed to normalize data transfers across the Atlantic, yet its stability is already in question. The dismissal of key oversight officials in the U.S. earlier this year has reignited doubts about its credibility, and a potential “Schrems III” ruling could invalidate it altogether.

In 2023 Meta was fined €1.2 billion for unlawful transfers of EU user data to the U.S., and in April 2025 the European Commission imposed an additional €200 million fine under the DMA. These actions illustrate that regulators are willing to enforce both data-protection and competition rules.

For enterprises, this uncertainty creates ongoing legal risk. Tools like Microsoft Teams or Slack may be convenient, but their compliance assurances remain tied to a fragile transatlantic agreement.

Take Back Control of Your Digital Infrastructure

Explore how leading European enterprises are reducing reliance on Big Tech.
Our Enterprise Guide breaks down real strategies to regain sovereignty, compliance, and trust.

Download the Report

U.S. Platforms Can Be Interrupted or Restricted Overnight

The risk landscape extends beyond privacy. U.S. cloud services are subject to export controls, sanctions, and political mandates that can override customer agreements.
Recent years have seen cases where U.S. technology companies restricted or suspended services to international organizations under government pressure. Such incidents highlight that Europe’s digital continuity can be disrupted by decisions made far outside its jurisdiction.

Meanwhile, outages on global platforms reveal how interlinked Europe’s infrastructure has become. The AWS incident in October 2025 demonstrated that dependency on a small group of hyperscalers can affect entire supply chains, from government portals to e-commerce systems.

Resilience now demands diversification and local control.

How Europe Is Reducing Its Exposure to Foreign Infrastructure

Across the continent, governments and enterprises are rebalancing.
Initiatives such as France’s Cloud de Confiance, Germany’s T-Systems Sovereign Cloud, and the EU’s forthcoming EUCS certification scheme are setting new standards for trusted infrastructure.

Private-sector behavior mirrors this policy shift. Search data shows that interest in “European alternatives” has risen by 660% year over year, particularly for queries like “EU Teams alternative”, “EU secure email”, and “AWS alternative Europe”. CIOs and procurement teams are no longer exploring sovereignty for optics, they’re doing it for risk mitigation.

The emerging model is hybrid: global platforms for low-risk workloads and sovereign collaboration layers for sensitive communication. This approach safeguards compliance and resilience while maintaining productivity.

Download our report

Why Moving to European Alternatives Strengthens Compliance and Trust

Reducing reliance on U.S. platforms it’s not just about avoiding risk but represents an opportunity to regain control.
European providers such as Wire, Nextcloud, StackIT, Pydio, and Tuta are proving that sovereignty and usability can coexist. They combine end-to-end encryption, open-source transparency, and EU-only jurisdiction to deliver verifiable compliance and enterprise-grade functionality.

Early adopters gain more than legal assurance. They gain reputation, negotiation power, and alignment with Europe’s long-term strategy for digital autonomy.
As NIS2 and DORA take full effect, adopting sovereign alternatives will become other than a smart risk management, also a regulatory expectation.

The Lesson: Digital Sovereignty Is the Only Path to Resilience

Europe’s dependence on U.S. cloud and collaboration platforms has reached a tipping point. What began as a pragmatic shortcut to innovation now poses real exposure to legal conflicts, service disruption, and reputational damage.

Mitigating that risk doesn’t mean abandoning global ecosystems overnight. It means re-architecting critical communications and data flows around European-governed infrastructure, systems that guarantee control, transparency, and continuity under EU law.

In the digital age, sovereignty isn’t isolationism. It’s resilience. And for organizations that depend on trust, resilience is everything.